<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
>
<channel>
	<title>LOTTOmania Rated and Reviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lottomania.soft-system.qarchive.org/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lottomania.soft-system.qarchive.org/#comments</link>
	<description>Read what other users have to say about LOTTOmania. Dozens of reviews, opinions, comments, ratings and discussions updated in real time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate><br />
<b>Warning</b>:  date() [<a href='function.date'>function.date</a>]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in <b>/backup/qa/www/sub/rss/product.php</b> on line <b>32</b><br />
Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:12:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<item>
		<title>Author: S Lanczi</title>
		<link>http://lottomania.soft-system.qarchive.org/#comment-31316</link>
		<dc:creator>S Lanczi</dc:creator>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  date() [<a href='function.date'>function.date</a>]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Chicago' for 'CDT/-5.0/DST' instead in <b>/backup/qa/www/sub/rss/product.php</b> on line <b>46</b><br />
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:12:21 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://lottomania.soft-system.qarchive.org/#comment-31316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[   Dear Sir:<br><br>I have been a user of the original program that was LOTTOmania 2000 if i remember correctly and been in touch regularly with Lucjan Brzyski who wrote the program. We still tuch base now and than.<br>The program is very good, but unfortunately there<br>is no real way to beet the lottery. Unfortunately<br>here in Canada most of our games are hopeless since they all use 45 or more numbers, mostly 49#\'s, thus the odds are too high and recently they have increased the cost of tickets to discarage the use of computer programs. I have been disabled since 1990, thus I can\'t afford to by tickets, but I constantly run trials to see if<br>I could win. The programs are so good today that you can test your ideas without buying tickets and see how things would turn out. I only play<br>Canada, Ontario49 since it is the cheapest if I find a solution.I can afford to play for $0.50<br>per draw. Last draw I would only have 1# correct<br>in 18#\'s. The previous draw I would have had 3#\'s<br>but 3/6 would not put together 3#\'s on one line.<br>I have about 30 programs on my system and one 3/6<br>would put the numbets together for a wery small win, but wich wheel to use from many. While I was able to work, I played ewery draw and run some company pools, but no big wins, but frequent small ones. So far nobody solwed the mystery so far and if somebody would, than they would change the number of numbers in the pool and the system would no loger work. The only thing I can see is that the chances of winning should be increased considerably by playing a system and it would require a lot of money before a big worthwile win. I have contemplated the idea of playing all draws for a year win or loose and I\'m nearly certain that the monoy invested may come back, but now I can not afford it any longer. Winning is pure luck and luck culd be improved, but that is all. A full wheel for 6/49 3/5 takes from 160 to 200 tkt\'s approximately and it is allmost shure that your money is gone other than at least 1* 3/6 usualy<br>there would be more than one and perhaps a 4/6.<br>The 1:14 million chances could be considerably reduced but would still be too high.<br><br>   Yours: A. Stephan Lanczi.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[   Dear Sir:<br><br>I have been a user of the original program that was LOTTOmania 2000 if i remember correctly and been in touch regularly with Lucjan Brzyski who wrote the program. We still tuch base now and than.<br>The program is very good, but unfortunately there<br>is no real way to beet the lottery. Unfortunately<br>here in Canada most of our games are hopeless since they all use 45 or more numbers, mostly 49#\'s, thus the odds are too high and recently they have increased the cost of tickets to discarage the use of computer programs. I have been disabled since 1990, thus I can\'t afford to by tickets, but I constantly run trials to see if<br>I could win. The programs are so good today that you can test your ideas without buying tickets and see how things would turn out. I only play<br>Canada, Ontario49 since it is the cheapest if I find a solution.I can afford to play for $0.50<br>per draw. Last draw I would only have 1# correct<br>in 18#\'s. The previous draw I would have had 3#\'s<br>but 3/6 would not put together 3#\'s on one line.<br>I have about 30 programs on my system and one 3/6<br>would put the numbets together for a wery small win, but wich wheel to use from many. While I was able to work, I played ewery draw and run some company pools, but no big wins, but frequent small ones. So far nobody solwed the mystery so far and if somebody would, than they would change the number of numbers in the pool and the system would no loger work. The only thing I can see is that the chances of winning should be increased considerably by playing a system and it would require a lot of money before a big worthwile win. I have contemplated the idea of playing all draws for a year win or loose and I\'m nearly certain that the monoy invested may come back, but now I can not afford it any longer. Winning is pure luck and luck culd be improved, but that is all. A full wheel for 6/49 3/5 takes from 160 to 200 tkt\'s approximately and it is allmost shure that your money is gone other than at least 1* 3/6 usualy<br>there would be more than one and perhaps a 4/6.<br>The 1:14 million chances could be considerably reduced but would still be too high.<br><br>   Yours: A. Stephan Lanczi.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss> 

